Welcome to empowr,
where you earn by simply posting:
Good news! You got 1 free crypto coin thanks to your inviter. Send them a quick thanks after you sign up!

New to empowr?

Why empowr (Part 7)

by Johnny Cash on February 01, 2017

Why empowr (Part 7)

Hello everyone,

Together, we've been reading the Why empowr book, written by one of the empowr founders.

Just joining the conversation? You can read the earlier parts here:  
Part 1:   Here
Part 2:   Here
Part 3:  Here
Part 4:  Here
Part 5:  Here
Part 6:  Here

As always, many thanks for your thoughtful comments that you left in the earlier parts.

Each and every comment, each and every word that you leave is being carefully, read and digested by empowr's team and management, the founders and myself. Thank you!

I'll try and post a new part every day when there's not another announcement.

And for the benefit of readers, I promise to do a better job at removing all garbage and unrelated comments, such as "Why does PayPal not work in my country" and "Where's my cash out?" and "More money for me!", which have nothing to do with the topic of this blog post.


In recent decades, the peaceful revolution that is so important to the long-term success of democratic governments and those countries they serve has been hijacked by special interests. No longer is the old guard being replaced with fresh new faces who bring vigor and passion to their work.

Rather, many democratic governments are now completely beholden to powerful groups within their country, which bankroll politicians’ campaigns in an effort to keep things exactly the way they are, because the status quo is already making these groups rich beyond belief.

This has left many democracies unable to respond to the needs of the countries and people they govern or to the global challenges that the past century has presented.

It was 2 a.m., and I was sleeping in my office parking lot with my head resting on a moldy pillow. Next to me were several Chevy vans stuffed with envelopes containing many millions of dollars. As a tech entrepreneur, this was most definitely not what I’d had in mind when I’d started the business. The story leading up to my night of parking lot van babysitting is a case study in how government can go wrong, and how the democratic process has been damaged over the past few decades.

I was running my very first company after dropping out of college, and it had taken off very quickly. The basic idea was relatively simple: we helped students find scholarships and grants on the Internet.

Back in those days, searching the Internet (called Arpanet at the time) was a much more complex operation. Computers were more expensive, worked many times slower, and rarely connected to a network. So, to find scholarships on the Internet, students would send in their search request along with a sixty-dollar check, and we would key their search into our computers, scour the Internet, print the results, and send them back to them.

By developing software-based information crawlers, we had automated the process of trolling the computers of university financial aid offices and had amassed a large database of financial aid sources, similar to the way Google crawls the Internet today to build its search database.

As soon as our database was packed with hundreds of thousands of sources of financial aid, we gave students at my university (University of California, San Diego) first pass at it. Word of mouth exploded on that campus. Within weeks, word had spread to neighboring colleges. Only two months after launching, requests for our services were coming in from virtually every other college and university around the nation. To the best of my knowledge, this was the first commercially successful Internet search business.


Unaccountable Government and Runaway Bureaucracy

Unfortunately for us, the United States Postal Service became alarmed at the exploding number of envelopes that we were receiving each day and the amount of money they contained. This resulted in the Postal Service essentially holding our company hostage by seizing our mail and revenues, making it impossible for us to pay the rent or even make payroll. Our only option was to take up the case in federal court, in essence suing the federal government in its own courtrooms—a daunting task for a twenty-one-year-old with only a few months’ business experience who had never even seen the inside of a courtroom.

My lawyers advised me not to fight the case, given that a staggeringly high percentage of these types of cases are won easily by the government. But, in my almost naive belief in the U.S. justice system, I couldn’t fathom being taken advantage of in such a way without putting up a fight.

I will never forget the answer the prosecutor gave to the federal judge when asked why the Post Office had taken the action in the first place, and how many complaints they were responding to. “No,” he said. “There weren’t any complaints from customers. But, in our experience, when a company is doing this well this fast, they must be doing something wrong.”

It was then that I fully realized that not only was I being unjustly prosecuted by the government, but the people who were pursuing the case were doing so because, in their eyes, my business was simply too successful.

The United States government was too powerful and out of control.

On a quick side note, my attorney in this case also suggested that the investigators were probably quite happy to be in the city of San Diego at the time of year that our hearing took place. American East Coast cold is no joke, and it may well have been possible that a taxpayer-funded vacation to America’s finest city was just too tempting to pass up. Obviously, it’s just a theory…, but it does serve to give you an idea of how bad potential governmental abuse of power can be when there is no proper oversight by responsible elected officials. But I digress.

Long story short: in large part because of expert testimony from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD)’s Director of Financial Services Thomas Rutter, the judge ruled in our favor and ordered the Postal Service to release our mail and money. By that time, mountains of envelopes had accumulated containing checks that totaled, cumulatively, many millions of dollars. There were so many envelopes that we needed several large vans to transport them from the Postal Office to the bank. Since the bank just closed for the weekend, my business partner and I, along with some of our employees, had to take turns sleeping in the vans to make sure they didn’t disappear before Monday, along with all the money they contained.

I had been incredibly fortunate. If it weren’t for UCSD’s Thomas Rutter’s ability to really understand what our software was doing, plus his belief that the American justice system ultimately could reach the right conclusion, I probably would have lost. And if the federal judge hadn’t decided to allow me to bring in and connect up all my computers in her courtroom and hadn’t actually come down from her bench to sit in front of them and patiently learn what my software did—which was unprecedented at the time and occurred over the many objections of the government prosecutors—I surely would have lost.

In addition, if my 200 employees hadn’t believed in the company enough to stick around, even though they were not being paid during those few months when our money was held captive by the government, there would have been no company to come back to after winning. And that’s how powerful the government is: even in the slight chance that they lose, they still succeed at their objective of breaking the people and businesses they pursue.

In fact, just a few days after winning the case, I ended up resigning from my company. I didn’t shut it down, because I wanted the employees that had believed and waited so patiently to still have their jobs, but I simply handed my share of the company to my co-founderfor freeand walked away with only a promise that he would be kind to the employees. Sure, I was exhausted but perhaps more importantly, I was disgusted by what I had learned about the system and government that I had believed in with all my heart. I needed time to rethink what had happened before I could care again to muster up the energy to do anything in America – including live in it. You see, I was in love with America, and now I felt violated and betrayed, like I imagine one would feel when they first find out that their lover had cheated on them.

After having a chance to get some distance from the whole experience, it wasn’t hard to conclude that America had not betrayed me. Even though I had been unjustly persecuted and bullied by the United States government, America had ultimately—through its quite purposely separated and independent judicial system—kept its promise.

I decided that what I should do, instead of becoming bitter or jaded, is use my talents and energies to double-down on the concept of America and do my part to help correct its injustices.

Years later, out of curiosity, I reached out to the government investigator who had been responsible for starting the investigation. He apologized and admitted that they’d been “overzealous” in pursuing their case against us. Having a talent for understatement is, apparently, a prerequisite for a job with the government.

In any case, I try not to hold grudges, so I look at the entire thing as water under the bridge. That said, I do think the story provides a good example of why and how systems that are supposed to be democratic have become bogged down by their own bloated weight over the past few decades.

I don’t really blame the postal investigators for initiating the investigation. My company received amounts of money in the mail that grew exponentially, and I can totally understand how it might have looked suspicious. But when it found no evidence of wrongdoing, including and especially no unhappy customers, the government should have ended the investigation and let me go back to running my business. Instead, because of American democracy’s increasing inability to create “peaceful revolutions” at the top, the U.S. government poured tons of taxpayer dollars into a case that, early on, they had already figured out had no foundation.

One other very important thing that my experience with the government taught me: you should never back down from a fight if you believe your cause is just. No matter how powerful the person or organization you’re going up against is, you should you always stick to your guns. If your intention is to improve the world in some way, you will invariably face the very forces that have worked to keep it the way that it currently is.

This philosophy has helped me countless times throughout my professional life and has been a huge part of the success I’ve been fortunate enough to find. In fact, without learning this vital lesson, I would never have been able to build empowr and assemble the team capable of creating the Democratic Social Economy that powers it.


David and Goliath

Unfortunately for everybody, once organizations within governments get going in a certain direction, it’s nearly impossible for them to adjust course even slightly, let alone change course entirely. After the investigators started the investigation, they became slaves of a system that insisted they throw a crazy amount of resources at it, in order to justify their case against us. The system expected things to be done a certain way; the way that they had been done for decades, because of a lack of shake-ups at the top. And I bet that, if anybody involved in the investigation had tried to stop it, they would have been hung out to dry by their coworkers and superiors for endangering the case and the huge budget expenditures it had generated.

The government agency needs its budget to keep running, and, if it can be demonstrated that the organization wasted money on frivolous lawsuits, their budget is likely to be cut. So, by winning cases like this at any cost, they are “proving” that they are doing things right and saving themselves from both budget cuts and embarrassment.

In much the same way, the democratic process has been hijacked in a number of countries around the world. Politicians in a number of the world’s democracies are required to raise huge sums of money in order to run the campaigns they need to be elected to political office. While the most expensive campaigns are typically for national office, even state and local elections are becoming something that only people who start out wealthy (or who are successful at enlisting wealthy backers) can ever hope to afford.

Depending on the length of their terms, this phenomenon means that politicians are forced to spend far too much of their time in office worrying about how they are going to pay for their reelection campaign and not nearly enough time figuring out ways to fix the country’s problems. This is evidenced by the ridiculous amount of “pork” attached to many pieces of new legislation. Pork is just a succinct way of saying that a politician involved in the writing of a bill added something to it that ensured his political backers got a few vanloads of taxpayer dollars thrown their way.

As with the investigators from the U.S. government, I don’t blame individual politicians themselves for worrying more about getting reelected than about doing their jobs once they’re in office. Many democratic systems have been corrupted to the point where the people who run them are absolutely required to kowtow to the needs of special vested interests if they want to stand any chance of rising to or staying in political office.

Even worse, on the rare occasion that a politician is elected without leasing her political career to big money and then tries to change the way the system works, she is attacked from all sides by her colleagues and by the special interests who make a killing maintaining the status quo. For an example, let’s look to my home country, the United States.

Endangered Democracy and the Rise of the Post-industrial Oligarch

In the U.S., only a couple thousand companies have $1 billion of yearly revenue. Thanks to the erosion of campaign finance laws (which used to limit how much money these companies can give politicians), these 2,000 or so companies have a much larger say in the direction of political discourse within the United States than the vast majority of the American people. This is because politicians (especially those seeking national office) know that, in order to get elected and pursue their political agenda, they have absolutely no choice but to keep happy these couple thousand companies plus a number of billionaires and a group of special interests with big budgets. If they do so, they can afford the television ads required to get the vote. If they don’t, they won’t be reelected. Unfortunately, it really is that simple.

As a result of this warped democratic process, the peaceful revolutions that our elections used to usher in have become things of the past. Here in the U.S. (a shining example of democracy that is looked to by a lot of the world—or used to be…), we are now electing (and re-electing again and again and again) politicians who have no business being in public office. This happens to a large degree because, at one point in time, elected officials decided to make it easier to stay in power by attacking term limits (i.e., how many times they can run for reelection) and by rolling back campaign finance reforms. Because of this, the same stagnation that occurs within corporations that don’t introduce peaceful revolutions at the top (the ones that bring in new people, ideas, and passion) is also occurring within the government of the United States.

As a consequence, the great effects of a vibrant, thriving democracy that we once enjoyed here in the States are disappearing. Here are just a few examples:

    Since the U.S.’s most recent economic recovery began, roughly 95% of the new wealth created has gone to the top 1% of income earners.

    The United States now has more people in jail, per capita, than any other country in the world—even more than the most repressive regimes on the planet.

    Since 1990, the cost of living within our country has jumped over 55% while the purchasing power of the minimum wage has risen only by roughly 19%.

    U.S. roads, bridges and other public infrastructure are crumbling, with investment down to less than .5% GDP behind Australia’s 1.25% and nine other developed nations.[iv]

    The U.S educational system, once among the top in the world, is now in 14th place and falling, according to Pearson’s Global Education Index.

    Americans spend double the amount per capita on healthcare as other first-world nations, while at the same time our country ranks near the bottom of the industrialized world when it comes to preventing avoidable deaths through timely, effective medical care.

    Satisfaction with national government is at a near all-time low, hovering between 10% and 20%, depending on whom you ask and what branch is being discussed.

               Why empowr (Part 7) 

During the late 19th and through the 20th century, the average years of service for Senators has increased steadily, from an average of just under five years in the early 1880s to an average of just over thirteen years in recent Congresses.


               Why empowr (Part 7) 

Similarly, the average years of service of Representatives has increased from just over four years in the first two Congresses of the 20th century to an average of approximately ten years in the three most recent Congresses.

                   Why empowr (Part 7)


Given the public’s almost complete lack of confidence in congress, you might be shocked to know that the reelection rate of congressmen has never dropped below 80% for the past half century for our House of Representatives and has averaged over 80% for our Senate in the past thirty years.

                Why empowr (Part 7) 

If almost all the people don’t like their representatives but those representatives almost always get reelected, it doesn’t take a genius to conclude that the people have lost control of their government, which means calling it a democracy is inaccurate.

Once again, I don’t think it’s the fault of the individual politicians for doing what they need to do in order to be reelected. No matter how noble a politician’s ideals, if they can’t get elected and retain their office, they can’t do a damned thing other than complain.

However, this phenomenon of the constant reelection of politicians who comprise a government that the vast majority of voters disapprove of is a symptom of a broken democratic system that needs to change if it expects to survive. John F. Kennedy once said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."


Amada Marcelino

Wow, very wonderful history!!!
It is for our awareness...

34 months ago
Muhammad Sarwar

i understand a lot of from these chained posts. thanks for sharing with us.

34 months ago
Yura Mashkarynets

Veri beautiful blog of my friend, thank you for sharing this great post. Have a good day.

34 months ago
Rajesh Gupta

Great lesson from history, Thank you JC

34 months ago
Bob Poster

Hello JC,

Another good post. The US government needs to be changed. In other democracies, they are more than 2 parties. The 2 party system needs to go away. It is definitely out-dated. New change is good so we will what will happen now under the new president. I am looking forward to the next chapter.

34 months ago
Johnny Cash

Thank you Bob; hope all is well.

34 months ago
T Asia

Great job, well done!
Empower the best social network in the world! I wish You good health, peace, success in everything, lots of great AMCO'S!

34 months ago
Mila Sorensen

Hi T Asia, thanks for your positivity and kind words. It's awesome to see how excited you are about empowr, and AMCOs! Thank you!

34 months ago
Marry Unchang

Indeed another thoughtful information regarding democracy. I can say that something to ponder and learned from it.
Happy reading and have a great day Empowrians.

34 months ago
Andrey Kunets

Featuring articles, Thank you. I am pleased to read your blogs.

34 months ago
Jeannette Leduc

Wow, I anticipated what was to come in this chapter with my comment to the last chapter that the US government is actually run by powerful interest maintaining the status quo!
I certainly hope President Trump can change things in Washington since he is an outsider not beholden to these powerful interests.
I really liked the last quote he gave from John F. Kennedy re lack of peaceful revolution leading to violent revolution.

34 months ago
Mila Sorensen

Jeannette, thanks for keeping up on all of the chapters so far. You've been so engaged and we've appreciated your participation. This is certainly an interesting time for American politics - it will be interesting to watch the future as it unfolds. Thanks Jeannette!

34 months ago
Indra SiGe

I agree in the term of 'The United States government was too powerful and out of control.'

34 months ago
Aurora Cruz-Schertel

I second the motion.

34 months ago
Jeannette Leduc

I remember reading from a disillusioned one term representative that as soon as he arrived in Washington, his party told him that his main focus was to raise party funds by spending 60 to 80% of the time on it which included long hours on the phone, giving fundraising speeches, etc. He found only about 1 hour available morning and afternoon do read government documents, etc. and needed to have staff brief him on upcoming legislation. It is why few bills are read in their entirety by legislators in the US and so many laws are attached to bills at the end to enable supporters to get legislation in their favour that legislators did not know about until outrage is expressed about it by those disadvantaged by the new laws that were added at the last minute.

34 months ago
Talgat Bakhtiyarov

Denmark is an interesting and informative information which gives reason to think.

34 months ago
David Bruyland

Very interesting and educating blog post.
Thanks for all the valuable information JC.

34 months ago
Mthalfangel @empowr.com

This man is very well informed and totally understands the problems facing our government and our nation. He is amazing. I want to meet him someday, because he is my new hero. He is absolutely right that our nation's grand experiment has been usurped by the greedy self serving bloated pigs that our colonial ancestors fled from and fought to end.

34 months ago
Mila Sorensen

Hi Mthalfangel, we're so happy to hear that you've been so positively affected by the chapters so far! I think the author would agree, that education and knowledge are really two of the key ingredients to better understanding and being well informed. Stay tuned for the next chapters! Thank you again.

34 months ago
Crispina Palopalo

Amazing and interesting topic about democracy. Awesome and great post. Thank you JC and will reread again later :)

34 months ago
Kenny Bharksuwan

very interesting. Thank you. Can't wait for the next part.

34 months ago
Life Is Everything (faith)

A better democracy will never be achieved if the government itself is the problem. I read your script in comparison with what the world is going through. Potential people with great ideas to world change is never achieved because of inequality and unpopularity or out of penny to fight moving to positive change. I'm happy reading your blog sir Johnny and have a positive view that Empowr has a great role for economic and democratic change. Stand for the world when it's right . People change Mind change quickly but only good prosper forever. Thanks for sharing always your blog filled of challenges to individuals. Nationals and world perspectives....God bless you more and your whole team.....

34 months ago
Sasha O''Neil

Thank you Glory, we are so happy you enjoy reading the blog posts and take away so much thought provoking material with you! It is great to compare the book with the world today.

34 months ago
Татьяна Вишневская

I like this article! Useful and interesting information!

34 months ago
Olga Rakhimova

Great post. I read with pleasure and gratitude!

34 months ago
Lloyd Baltar

Great chapter. Thanks for sharing

34 months ago
Tatsiana Komarova

Thanks you! Interesting!

34 months ago
Personlab Yb

Hello friends

I perfectly understand you, and I understand why you did.
The state system is based on the management and employees, people who go against the system and try to break it will be destroyed, as the state system need slaves to perform the dirty work.
State system is not profitable for people to have a lot of money, as it plummets from the state budget.

And if a person has the money he earned in non-state system, it will be checked according to the rules of the system.

The only way out is of such a situation is to start a business and pay taxes, since only by sharing their income with the system according to the rules of the state system, it will leave you alone


34 months ago
Mariam Avagyan

Thanks to Yuri, I liked your thoughts and how you think

34 months ago
Rom Ned

Excellent history! It is interesting to read and understand a lot of things!
Thanks friends!

34 months ago
Dzack Co

A great lesson..
' Broken Democracy '

34 months ago
Zlatko Miko

I like this chapter very much. Thanks!

34 months ago
Madonna Marie Perez

Amazing story! I just hope the democracy will be democracy..

34 months ago
Parvu Chivuta

Very good post , thanks for story !

34 months ago
Muhammad Sadeeq

great chapter thanks for story

34 months ago

Always interesting to read your thoughts on this. Many perceived differently. Thank you very much for your work!

34 months ago
Yanusya Senko

I agree with you, Johnny, if you engage the right thing, that improve the lives of others and to some degree the whole world, we can not give up, we must fight. Thank you for the informative chapter.

34 months ago
Sasha O''Neil

We are so happy you agree Yanusya! That is true never give up and fight on!

34 months ago
Abd Elmanam

company that
I used in shipping
Non-existent here at the site within the tracking lines which put empowers
So please put this company here
The name of this company ( USA Express)

34 months ago
Lebanon Raingam

Interesting and useful information. Thanks again.

34 months ago
Angela Jurmoni

A very interesting story! I enjoyed reading about your beginnings as an entrepreneur! I think this story is like a mirror reflecting the image of each and every society all over the world. It is important to keep believing in your dreams and fight for them even if all seems to be against you, "if you believe your cause is just" - as you say. But sometimes this is consumming so much time and energy ....
Interesting considerations on American democracy! I enjoyed reading this part, too. Even if Romania is a much smaller country, I think this analysis matches to our situation, too. Unfortunatelly! And what's happening these days in our country makes me wonder about your conclusion - Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable (JFK). No matter who is right, I think that communication is very important in life, as well in society! We all have to learn from each other and have to remember that our entire life is a long process of learning and understanding.
Thank you.

34 months ago
Sasha O''Neil

Thank you Angela, your response demonstrates that you gained a great understanding of the topics at hand; it is interesting how you were able to recognize parallels between the American democracy and your own country. It is great to see how much you value communication and learning from one another, this is a key element here on empowr! Thank you for your support and helping us make our mission a reality!

34 months ago

It is very interesting, but do not understand through an interpreter Google, unfortunately. Very, very sorry. If it was a normal website translation, business would simply be taken off.

34 months ago

Excellent post! Good work, thanks for sharing, good luck in everything!

34 months ago
Marsianec .

Interesting information, thank you.

34 months ago
Peggiecharles Okafor

Interesting piece!

34 months ago